Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, reviewstook.com earns from qualifying purchases. Links to Amazon on this page are affiliate links; they cost you nothing extra.
Quick answer: Both are 49 g tri-mode wireless mice. The Attack Shark X3 (about $39) lists the PixArt PAW3395 26K sensor and Kailh switches; the Redragon M725 (about $24) lists up to 8,000 DPI and five programmable buttons.
This comparison is built from the product listings on Amazon, not our own testing. Prices were as listed on October 30, 2026 and change. Confirm details on the product pages.
Last updated: October 30, 2026.
At a Glance
| Feature | Attack Shark X3 | Redragon M725 Honeycomb |
|---|---|---|
| Listed price (Oct 30, 2026) | About $39 | About $24 |
| Weight | 49 g | 49 g |
| Connection | Bluetooth 5.2, 2.4 GHz, wired | Type-C wired, Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz |
| Sensor | PAW3395, up to 26,000 DPI, 650 IPS | Up to 8,000 DPI, 5 levels |
| Switches | Kailh GM 8.0, 80 million cycles | Not highlighted |
| Buttons | Programmable | 5 programmable buttons |
| Shell | Not stated as honeycomb | Honeycomb |
Key Differences
Sensor
The X3 lists a flagship-class sensor.
Price
The M725 is about $15 cheaper.
Shell
The M725 uses a honeycomb shell.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose the Attack Shark X3 if
you want a better sensor and switches.
Choose the Redragon M725 Honeycomb if
you want the lowest-priced light wireless mouse.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is lighter?
Both list 49 g.
Which has the better sensor?
The Attack Shark X3.
Are they tri-mode?
Yes.
Bottom Line
Choose the X3 for performance, the M725 for price. See best lightweight gaming mice.
