The Tamron 28-200mm and the Sony FE 24-240mm are both all-in-one travel zooms for Sony full-frame mirrorless cameras. The Tamron is more compact and opens wider at the short end, while the Sony covers a broader range with more reach and stabilization in the lens. Choose by what matters most to you, and confirm specs on each maker’s page.

What Each Lens Does
The Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD is a compact zoom that opens up to f/2.8 at 28mm. It aims to give a light travel package with a surprising amount of reach and a brighter wide end than many all-in-one lenses.
The Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS covers a wider opening angle and a longer telephoto end. It includes optical stabilization, which is handy at long focal lengths.
Side by Side
| Trait | Tamron 28-200mm | Sony 24-240mm |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 28-200mm | 24-240mm, wider and longer |
| Aperture | f/2.8 at wide end, f/5.6 at long end | f/3.5 at wide end, f/6.3 at long end |
| Size class | Compact and light | Larger |
| Stabilization | Check the maker; body may help | Optical stabilization in the lens |
The Tamron’s brighter aperture helps in dim interiors and for blurrier backgrounds at the wide end. The Sony’s extra width and reach mean you can handle both larger scenes and distant subjects from one spot.
How to Choose
- Decide what you miss most: a wider angle and more reach, or a lighter lens and a brighter aperture.
- Check your camera body. Newer Sony bodies have strong in-body stabilization, which narrows the gap if the lens lacks it.
- Think about your day. A lighter setup is more comfortable for long walks and city days.
- Consider the light you shoot in. For bright outdoor travel, either lens works; for dim restaurants and streets, the brighter option helps.
- Compare video features, such as focus behavior and stabilization, if you record footage.
Realistic Expectations
- All-in-one zooms are about convenience, so expect some compromise in low light and edge detail.
- Stopping down a bit can improve detail across the frame.
- Both lenses are best seen as travel companions rather than specialist tools.
Think too about the kind of trip you take. City breaks, family days and walking tours reward a light lens you barely notice, while safaris, air shows or distant landmarks reward extra reach. Neither lens replaces a dedicated telephoto for serious wildlife, but both let you leave the bag of extra lenses at home and keep moving.
FAQ
Which lens is better for landscapes?
The Sony reaches a wider angle, which helps with sweeping scenes. The Tamron is still fine for landscapes at 28mm, and it is easier to carry on a hike.
Can I use these lenses for video?
Yes, though stabilization and focus behavior differ. Look at what each maker lists, and pair the lens with a body that has good stabilization.
The Short Version
Choose the Tamron 28-200mm for a compact, brighter-at-the-wide-end travel lens. Choose the Sony FE 24-240mm for the widest and longest reach with built-in stabilization. Confirm current details with Tamron and Sony before deciding.